BONDING IN ETHYNE (ACETYLENE)


Important!  The approach on this page follows on from the similar (but very slightly easier) explanation of the bonding in ethene. Unless you are already familiar with this, you should first read the page about ethene.

To understand ethene you also have to understand orbitals and the bonding in methane - sorry, there are no short-cuts! Depending on how many other pages you might have to refer to as well, return here later using the BACK button on your browser or the GO menu or HISTORY file - or via the Organic Bonding Menu (link from the bottom of each page in this section).



Ethyne, C2H2

The simple view of the bonding in ethyne

Ethyne has a triple bond between the two carbon atoms. In the diagram each line represents one pair of shared electrons.

If you have read the ethene page, you will expect that ethyne is going to be more complicated than this simple structure suggests.


An orbital view of the bonding in ethyne

Ethyne is built from hydrogen atoms (1s1) and carbon atoms (1s22s22px12py1).

The carbon atom doesn't have enough unpaired electrons to form four bonds (1 to the hydrogen and three to the other carbon), so it needs to promote one of the 2s2 pair into the empty 2pz orbital. This is exactly the same as happens whenever carbon forms bonds - whatever else it ends up joined to.


Important!  If this isn't really clear to you, you must go and read the article about the bonding in methane.


Each carbon is only joining to two other atoms rather than four (as in methane or ethane) or three (as in ethene) and so when the carbon atoms hybridise their outer orbitals before forming bonds, this time they only hybridise two of the orbitals.

They use the 2s electron and one of the 2p electrons, but leave the other 2p electrons unchanged. The new hybrid orbitals formed are called sp1 hybrids, because they are made by an s orbital and a single p orbital reorganising themselves.


Note  The more modern name for what I call sp1 hybrids is just sp hybrids. I prefer the older name, because it emphasises the fact that only one p orbital is involved - even if the 1 is technically unnecessary. If your syllabus or teacher wants you to use just sp, then that's what you do.


What these look like in the atom (using the same colour coding) is:

Notice that the two green lobes are two different hybrid orbitals - arranged as far apart from each other as possible. Don't confuse them with the shape of a p orbital.

The two carbon atoms and two hydrogen atoms would look like this before they joined together:


The various atomic orbitals which are pointing towards each other now merge to give molecular orbitals, each containing a bonding pair of electrons. These are sigma bonds - just like those formed by end-to-end overlap of atomic orbitals in, say, ethane. The sigma bonds are shown as orange in the next diagram.

The various p orbitals (now shown in slightly different reds to avoid confusion) are now close enough together that they overlap sideways.



Sideways overlap between the two sets of p orbitals produces two pi bonds - each similar to the pi bond found in, say, ethene. These pi bonds are at 90° to each other - one above and below the molecule, and the other in front of and behind the molecule. Notice the different shades of red for the two different pi bonds.



Note:  Forgive my artistic (in)ability! In particular, these diagrams are not to scale. To get the p orbitals to overlap and still see what is going on at the back of the molecule, you have to shorten the carbon-carbon distance completely out of proportion. In truth, the carbon-hydrogen bond length is shorter than the carbon-carbon triple bond.



Questions to test your understanding

If this is the first set of questions you have done, please read the introductory page before you start. You will need to use the BACK BUTTON on your browser to come back here afterwards.

questions on bonding in ethyne

answers


Where would you like to go now?

To the organic bonding menu. . .

To menu of basic organic chemistry. . .

To Main Menu . . .



© Jim Clark 2006 (modified March 2013)